Here it is better to "dance" of the object. That is, first look for a house or estate, which would settle. And then see what kind of bank loans housing in it. The fact is, the bank will give money away is not under any new building, and under the unit – the ones where the builder has good contacts. This stems from the "opacity" of most business builders and developers.

Bank can be difficult to assess the risks, which, incidentally, and customer concern: whether dostroeno housing, which is collateral for the loan? And if so, at what time? Not bankrupt the company and not leave there and the tenants and their lenders with nothing? Incidentally, the very participation of the bank, and behind them the insurance company in its acquisition of primary residence can serve as a guarantee for the buyer – if so bankers agreed to lend the object its "primary", it means they are more or less sure that he would be in order. Question 2 says, sellers do not really want to deal with "mortgage" buyers. Is this true? And the truth is, 5-6 years ago it been a problem. And all because the banks had demanded from the customer's set of documents relating to the acquired property – far more than the package, which is required for normal transaction without the involvement of credit. Who was to gather additional information? The owners or realtors. And why should they bother, if it is so worth all of the customers with their own money? "Mortgage" applicant was refused or at best shell out and pay 1-2% of the purchase price, and maybe more. But now the situation has changed.